• Scult on Kaplan’s Philosophy

    by Mel Scult

    From time to time Mordecai Kaplan attempted to reduce his thinking about Judaism and religion to a series of principles that could be easily understood. We attempt yet again to summarize his thought in our own words.

    Kaplanā€™s approach to Judaism is usually associated with the primary concepts of his system ā€“ ā€œJudaism as a Civilization,ā€ ā€œLiving in Two Civilizations,ā€ ā€œThe Religion of Ethical Nationhood,ā€ ā€œA Greater Zionism,ā€ etc. But in order really to understand Kaplan it is important to get beneath these concepts to assumptions that are more fundamental. He formulated his system many times, and one sees that, even though the concepts change, the approach does not.

    Below is a provisional attempt to articulate these principles.

    1. Kaplan assumes that the truth, even ultimate truths, are the products of the human search for understanding. What is true at one time may not be true at another time. For Kaplan the truth may be found in many places and in many texts. No one people or tradition has a monopoly on truth. Indeed, at the center of his philosophy we do not find one ultimate truth but rather the religious life and experience of the Jewish people and the lives of religious seekers everywhere.

    Kaplan nonetheless understands our need for certainty even though we now live in a world where enduring truths are hard to come by. Yet we need them in an elemental way. Kaplan perceived the need to posit absolutes even though we know they are products of our own mind. One of his formulations regarding absolutes is the following:

    ā€œTo state the matter concretely, the right of every person to the full development of his physical and mental capacities … the solidarity of the entire human race ā€¦ and the duty of thinking and acting so as to render reality more meaningful and life more worthwhile for every human being ā€“ these are the goals which must be accepted as absolutes.ā€ [Kaplan Diary, December 9, 1942]

    2. The goal of every religious or ethnic group should be to support the uniqueness and growth of each of its members. These goals can only be achieved in a world that guarantees freedom, justice and peace for all human beings, including all races and both genders. Kaplan put it this way: ā€œIt is the goal of all social endeavor to bring about equality … . It is the goal of all spiritual endeavor to make individuals free.ā€ [Kaplan Diary, April 3, 1915, amended]

    Concerning the matter of religion in general Kaplan would say that any experience is religious if it connects you to others, to nature, to the world, and moves you out of your ego-centered existence and helps you to live on a higher, more transcendent level, ā€œsub specie aeternitatisā€ as Spinoza would say.

    The effort to move beyond our ego-centered life is expressed principally through the medium of prayer. Prayer is not primarily supplication but rather an energizing of the spirit in which we move higher, intellectually and ethically. Because we are fragmented in so many ways, prayer, properly used, can help to make us whole. We should begin with the traditional texts, but when they do not function we must move beyond them. We must move from quotation to affirmation, at the same time not losing sight of the importance of quotation.

    3. While all religious traditions are committed to the above ideals, they differ in the way these ideals are embodied.

    The general ideals that all religions share are incorporated into sacred texts [the Torah for the Jews], sacred times [the holy days], sacred people [theĀ  prophets and the rabbis], and sacred places [Eretz Yisrael, the land of Israel]. Each religion has its own sancta or sacred specifics.

    For the Jews, Torah is primary and represents the product of our efforts to find the holy and the divine within our lives. Torah is product and process at the same time. Torah is an extended conversation with other Jews and with the Torah text. Anyone who values the Jewish tradition should participate in that conversation.

    The commandments or mitzvot are to be understood as the customs that embody our ideals. They are always amenable to modification when they cease to function. The goal of Jewish ritual is to foster community and to encourage the members of the community to live a more ethical life. While Kaplan was clearly not halakhic he did believe that there should be general guidelines for ritual practice. He thought there should be a uniformity of purpose but this did not mean a homogeneity of practice. He was comfortable with the notion of obligation and thought there should be a minimum of ritual practice in the life of every Jew.

    Because all religions have fundamentally similar functions, no one religion is truer than the other. Different religions and different theological commitments simply have different emphases and reflect different theological ā€œmoodsā€.

    4. Individual life, and group life, may be understood in terms of the category of energy rather than truth. Judaism may thus be defined not in terms of a specific belief system or set of beliefs, but as the living energy of the Jewish people. A good Jew would be anyone who nurtures that living energy. This notion of energy implies the notion of Judaism as a Civilization. The living energy of the Jewish people may be nurtured in a whole host of ways, each of which is legitimate.

    5. The universe beyond may also be understood in terms of energy. Thus God should not be understood anthropomorphically but as the energy both within us and outside us that allows us to grow and to become fully human. In Kaplanā€™s words: ā€œGod is not an identifiable being who stands outside the universe. God is the life of the universe, immanent insofar as each part acts upon every other, and transcendent insofar as the whole acts upon each part.ā€ [Judaism as a Civilization, p. 316]

    And again: ā€œOnly by identifying the cosmic process at work in ourselves and mobilizing all our energies and inner drives in accordance with its demands are we likely to achieve our fulfillment as human beings.ā€

    In searching for a formulation of his belief in God, Kaplan settled on ā€œGod as the power that makes for salvation.ā€ Kaplan believed that the best Hebrew-Biblical term for salvation was ā€œshalomā€. God is thus the power that makes for ā€œshalomā€ in the world and also the power that makes for ā€œsheleymutā€ or completeness and fulfillment in human beings.

    The divine, of course, was always central to Kaplan. He thought about God all the time, but his system reflects a primary emphasis on salvation, the quest for peace and individual completeness [Shalom and Sheleymut]. At times he talked about salvation as becoming fully human, or moving toward moral perfection.

    As a pragmatist Kaplan came to believe that fulfillment consisted in being effective. The notion of being effective as an individual and as a Jew is at the heart of his system.

    Kaplan has been criticized for not having a clearly worked out metaphysics. As a pragmatic thinker he is more interested in the welfare of the Jewish people and of humanity than in ultimate metaphysical truths. Kaplanā€™s goal for the individual and for the community is enhancement. Whatever actions contribute to our individual and collective improvement is what we should adopt.

    6. In understanding ourselves and in understanding God, it is important to realize that both the self and God are not entities but processes. Kaplan is a process philosopher and believed that it is only the limitation of our minds that prevents us from grasping God and the self in their true light. In other words, what we do is to freeze the process in order to grasp it, and we do this through the use of nouns. Rather, we should use predicates. Thus instead of talking about God we should talk of the divine. Some refer to this as predicate theology because we do not talk of God [a noun] but of the divine [a predicate].

    The supernatural conception of God that sees the Divine will as operating in and creating and sustaining the world was rejected by Kaplan at an early point. He thought that the universe and the individual should be understood primarily through the physical and social sciences ā€“ this includes additionally both history and philosophy. We must confront the latest developments in the sciences and philosophy directly and without hesitation. Religion has nothing to fear from the most recent thinking on all subjects.

    7. The foundation of Kaplanā€™s approach was that the particular [the Jewish People] should be the vehicle for the Universal [shalom and sheleymut ā€“ peace and perfection; democratic individualism; human effectiveness and fulfillment]. For Kaplan the enhancement of the self implies concern for the other. To think that a person can act with complete self-regard and complete disregard of the other is like thinking of the self ā€œas though it were a stick with one end.ā€

    8. Kaplan believed that group life must be embodied in concrete realities. Consequently he was a lifelong Zionist of the Ahad Ha-Amian type, believing that the return of the Jews to Zion would only be meaningful with the revitalization of Jewish culture. He viewed the Jews as an international people with Israel as the center of a vigorous Jewish life. He thought that the Diaspora would always exist and that a vital Jewish life is possible everywhere. For the Jewish people inside Israel as well as outside, the concept of justice through law, which is the essence of the Torah, must govern both the individual and the collective.

    In summary, we might articulate the Reconstructionist commitment in the following words:

    To be a Jew you must identify with the great drama that is the life of the Jewish people. To be part of that drama, you must converse with the Jews of the past; you must use their experience and their wisdom to transcend yourself. You must make their experience your experience. You must recreate it so that you may restore and renew yourself. Make it part of your world ā€“ of your play and of your everyday. Make it work for you.

  • Recording of ā€œA New Haggadah for a Time of Crisis? The Radical 1941 Haggadah of Mordecai M. Kaplanā€ (4-5-20)

    In order to view or download the source sheet for this program, please click here.

    In order to view or download the lovely Haggadah addition from “Our Common Destiny” that was shared during the program, please click here.

  • I Remember Mordecai

    On this page you will find a treasure of reminiscences by those who knew Kaplan directly as a person- his students, family members, and more.

    Jack Wolofsky

    Jack Wolofsky, co-founder of the Kaplan Center, shares memories of and reflections about Kaplan.

    https://vimeo.com/968159527/84a3c1b055?share=copy

    Mitchell Rothman

    Rabbi Michael Cohen speaks with Mitchell Rothman,  life-long Kaplan student and devotee of the Kaplan diaries

    https://vimeo.com/881434472?share=copy

    Daniel Musher

    Daniel Musher, the grandson of Mordecai Kaplan,reminisces about Shabbat with his grandfather.

    https://vimeo.com/833411373/3c92577d02?share=copy

    Rabbis Ray Artz & Michael Graetz

    Rabbis Ray Arzt and Michael Graetz, students of Mordecai Kaplan, reflect on his impact on their approaches to Judaism

    https://vimeo.com/847045476?share=copy
  • Rabbi Manny Goldsmith Tributes

    The Kaplan Center joins the family and many communities touched by Rabbi Goldsmith in mourning his death and celebrating his life. He was a student, disciple, and colleague of Mordecai Kaplan of the highest order.


    In this folder, you will find four different tributes to his life:

    • an obituary shared by the Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association,
    • a tribute to him written by his children
    • a letter from Kaplan Center Board Member Jack Wolofsky about his decades-long relationship with “Manny”
    • and a tribute from Mel Scult, Vice President and Academic Advisor for The Kaplan Center.

    Later in the year, The Kaplan Center will publish several of Rabbi Goldsmith’s most seminal articles about Judaism and Democracy as part of a project with The Jewish Partisanship for Democracy, A More Perfect Union.

    Rabbi Dr. Emanuel S. Goldsmith (8/15/1935-1/5/2024) was a scholar of Yiddish literature, interpreter of Reconstructionism, teacher of Judaism, and musical composer, who inspired students and congregants with his love of Jewish life in all its forms. He taught on the faculties of Brandeis University, the University of Connecticut, and Queens College. Dr. Goldsmith authored and edited many books and articles, including Modern Yiddish Culture, Dynamic Judaism, and Yiddish Literature in America 1870-2000. He also served on the boards of directors of the Congress for Jewish Culture, the Rena Costa Center for Yiddish Studies at Bar Ilan University, and the Highland Institute for American Religious Thought. Dr. Goldsmith led congregations in Halifax NS (Shaar Shalom Congregation), Hyde Park MA (Adas Hadrath Israel) and Scarsdale NY (Mevakshei Derech). He was predeceased by his beloved wife Shirley (Zebberman) and her son Garry, and survived by children Mirele (Richard Marker), Leizer (Sharon Bray), Rachel (Howard Ungar), and step-children Beila Sherman, Dawn Rosen (Sam zā€l), Miryawm Faerman (Hillel), Tova Sherman (Joe Lang), grandchildren, and great-grandchildren.

    May Manny’s memory be a blessing and may those who mourn his passing find comfort among loving community.

    What a journey our father took over his lifetime.  In many ways he lived out a classic Jewish story, starting out as the child of immigrants in the Bronx, making the most of the opportunities America offered, entering the professional class and passing on his good fortune to his children.  In other ways he remained a child of that immigrant milieu until the end of his life.  The through line in Mannyā€™s life is his love for Judaism, Jewish life and the Jewish People. 

    Mannyā€™s father was raised in the Yishuv in Palestine.  Hayim came to America to escape the Turkish draft in the First World War.  He was proud of having attended the first modern, Hebrew-speaking school in Jerusalem, the Lemmel School. Hayim went to high school with Moshe Nathanson, credited (some say inaccurately) with composing Hava Nagila.  Hayimā€™s enthusiasm for Nathansonā€™s music had an enduring impact on Manny, who treasured his mixtapes of this music until the end.  Jewish music became one of his great passions ā€“ others being Yiddish, Reconstructionism, Theology and Philosophy.

    Mannyā€™s parents were ardent Zionists who read The Tog ā€“ a Zionist Yiddish newspaper that competed with the better-known Forward. Manny remembered his father taking him to many political meetings, exposing him to the vibrant Jewish atmosphere of New York City. He recalled collecting money for the Yishuv on the subway and sending packages to family in Jerusalem during the war.  His parents were also active members of two landsmanshaften (mutual aid society).

    Mannyā€™s mother came with her family from Ukraine to Minneapolis.  Manny met his grandparents only a couple of times ā€“ his parents were too poor and too tied down by their little Bronx grocery store to make the trip to Minneapolis.  On one such trip Mannyā€™s grandfather played a cantorial record for him ā€“ another important musical moment.  Like many immigrant parents, Mannyā€™s parents wanted him to learn English, but they took him to the Yiddish theater and listened to Yiddish radio.  Later, Manny used to say that he took up Yiddish to become closer to his mother.

    The New York public schools nurtured Mannyā€™s outgoing personality and love of performing. He liked to tell how he always played Santa at Christmas time because he was a round little boy.  He learned to play piano ā€“ or maybe he just played by ear ā€“ and toured as the ā€œHava Nagila Kid.ā€  He attended New York Cityā€™s High School of the Performing Arts and performed the lead role in a long-running show put on in Hebrew (HaOtsar Bā€™meara ā€“ the Treasure in the Cave) by the Jewish Board of Education for Hebrew school classes.  Manny followed a Jewish educational path that is hard to imagine today: He attended Willets Avenue Talmud Torah, the Marshalliya Jewish High School, and then the Jewish Theological Seminary (JTS). 

    Manny was fortunate to receive a world-class education, courtesy of New York City.  While at City College, Manny heard a lecture by Dr. Max Weinreichā€“ one of the founders of YIVO who took refuge in Americaā€“ about the Yiddish language.  After a chance encounter on the subway, Manny became so enamored with Dr. Weinreich that he vowed to take all of Weinreichā€™s classes. This was the start of his career as a scholar of Yiddish literature.

    Manny realized that his future lay in the Rabbinate and not on Broadway.  At JTS he encountered Rabbi Mordecai M. Kaplan, another teacher who changed his life. With his usual dramatic flair, he would tell the story of how he picked up Kaplanā€™s book, The Meaning of God in Modern Jewish Religion, and threw it down immediately upon reading the first paragraph.  He said that as a person training to be a rabbi, he was shocked that Kaplan wrote that the traditional view of God had no relevance to modern Jews.  But then, he would say, he picked the book back up because he was curious.  Manny began attending services at the Society for the Advancement of Judaism. Ultimately, he became a close student of Kaplanā€™s, including working for him as editor of The Reconstructionist journal, and indeed becoming a key interpreter and teacher of Kaplanā€™s ideas. Later, Manny expanded his scholarship in religious naturalism by drawing on the work of Protestant theologian Henry Nelson Weiman. Manny was particularly proud that he was accepted into the fellowship of Christian scholars at the Highlands Institute as a result of this work, and frequently enjoyed attending its annual conferences.

    While at JTS, Manny met and married Karen Merdinger, who was studying at the JTS Teachers Institute, headed at the time by Kaplan. Together they embraced Kaplanā€™s vision of Judaism as a civilization in their own life.  During this time, Manny was approached to record an album of Shabbat prayers and songs for the purpose of teaching students learning Hebrew with the newly popular Israeli accent. He composed some original music and conducted a choir of Seminary students to record the album, titled ā€œBeloved of Days.ā€  Just a few years ago one of his compositions, Chai Hashem, was re-recorded by local musician Chaim Fruchter.  He also performed with Theodore Bikel on the album Theodore Bikel Sings Jewish Folk Songs.

    Following graduation, Manny and Karen – now Kayla,  went to Israel where Manny hoped to pursue a PhD. Although that didnā€™t work out, they came home with their first child, Mirele.  Manny remained an ardent lover of the State of Israel and returned there many times. 

    Manny took a position as the Rabbi of Shaar Shalom Congregation in Halifax, Nova Scotia, where Leizer and Rachel were born.  Manny and Kayla became fast friends with Shirley and Dave Sherman and their family. Many years later Manny and Shirley married and Shirleyā€™s children, Beila, Garry, Dawn, Miryawm and Tova became Mannyā€™s as well. While living in Halifax in May 1963, Bull Connor unleashed his dogs and water cannons against peaceful civil rights demonstrators in Birmingham, Alabama. 

    Manny, a lifelong supporter of civil rights, traveled to Birmingham as a representative of the Rabbinical Assembly to stand in solidarity with Black leaders and the civil rights movement. He told the Halifax Mail-Star that: ā€œWe wanted to translate our religious beliefs and values into action. . . We wanted to practice what we preach about freedom, equality and human dignity.ā€ While in Birmingham, the rabbis stayed at the A. G. Gaston Motel, which was then bombed two days after they left. Manny participated with other rabbis in a private meeting with King, the NAACPā€™s Roy Wilkins, and other leaders, in which the rabbis continued to express support. When a colleague raised the issue of Black anti-semitism with King, Kingā€™s forceful and unequivocal response that it was to be eradicated so moved Manny that he mentioned it many times thereafter.  He said at the time that Dr. King was ā€œa great religious leader, for whom I have only the greatest admiration.ā€ True-to-form, after the Black and Jewish leaders had exchanged songs of love and freedom, he said he ā€œheard Godā€ in  the ā€œsongs and prayers of freedom he heard in the Black churches.ā€ He was later awarded life membership in the Nova Scotia Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

    After Halifax and short stints in New York and Washington DCā€“ where they taught the Confirmation and Post Confirmation classes at Adas Israelā€“ Manny and Kayla moved to Brookline, Massachusetts and Manny earned his PhD at Brandeis University.  His PhD thesis on the Czernowitz Conference on Yiddishā€“ a pivotal moment in Jewish intellectual historyā€“ became an instant classic in the field.  While a student, Manny made a living leading several congregations part-time.  He loved to tell how he once held 3 rabbinic gigs simultaneously: one Reform, one Conservative, and the third Orthodox. Ultimately, he remained the rabbi of Congregation Adas Hadrath Israel in Hyde Park – the Conservative congregationā€“ even after moving away from the Boston area.  In 1990, the congregation honored him for twenty inspiring years of service.

    Manny taught at the University of Connecticut and then moved to Queens College, as Professor of Yiddish and Jewish studies.  While in Queens he took on editing Yiddish Literature in America 1870-2000. This huge two-volume anthology was a project of the Congress for Jewish Culture and was to be carried out by a committee. As time went on, many of the committee members passed away.  Manny completed this major work by working with the proofreader of the Yiddish Forward and the cover artist. 

    Manny also recorded an album  ā€œI Love Yiddishā€ on which he recites Yiddish poetry, sings and plays the piano.  This is a wonderful snapshot of his love of Yiddish Language and Culture.

    Manny married Shirley in 1982.  After her divorce, Shirley had made aliyah and took a job as a social worker in Jerusalem.  Manny went to Israel to visit and propose.  Shirley was surprised when he asked her to marry him.  It was just before Passover and Shirley promised to wind up her affairs in Israel and join Manny in New York by Seder.  Shirley encouraged Manny to accept a position as the part-time Rabbi of Reconstructionist Congregation Mā€™vakshei Derech in Scarsdale NY, which he held until retirement.  

    Manny and Shirley moved to Ring House at the end of 2009.  For the first year they faithfully attended Bā€™nai Israel Congregation where Rachel was working.  Manny and Shirley then found their home at Adat Shalom where the Rabbis appreciated his mini-sermons offered from his seat in the congregation. He continued to teach and inspire, delivering lectures that were co-sponsored by Adat Shalom.  When he could no longer lecture, he began delivering programs on Jewish music for Ring House residents. He was able to indulge his bibliomania by rebuilding the library he had sold upon retirement by purchasing secondhand books, and to enjoy his extensive music collection, movies curated by Shirley, and time with his grandchildren.  After Shirley died, Manny was fortunate to receive loving care at Brightview and finally at Larmax Group Homes.

    When Manny was declining he would repeat his famous one-liner about Judaism and his worldview.  He was particularly fond of saying, ā€œJudaism is ethics wrapped up in beautiful traditions.ā€  Mannyā€™s enthusiasm for Judaism, loyalty to the Jewish People, and enjoyment of Jewish life was the essence of his being. He was blessed to be able to devote his life to this passion, fulfilling the beautiful words of the Psalms: ā€œOne thing do I ask of God, it is this that I seek: to live in the house of God all the days of my life, to behold Godā€™s sweetness and frequent Godā€™s house.ā€ (Psalm 27:4)

    Rabbi Dr. Emanuel S. Goldsmith (8/15/1935-1/5/2024) was a scholar of Yiddish literature, interpreter of Reconstructionism, teacher of Judaism, and musical composer, who inspired students and congregants with his love of Jewish life in all its forms. He taught on the faculties of Brandeis University, the University of Connecticut, and Queens College. Dr. Goldsmith authored and edited many books and articles, including Modern Yiddish Culture, Dynamic Judaism, and Yiddish Literature in America 1870-2000. He also served on the boards of directors of the Congress for Jewish Culture, the Rena Costa Center for Yiddish Studies at Bar Ilan University, and the Highland Institute for American Religious Thought. 

    Dr. Goldsmith led congregations in Halifax NS (Shaar Shalom Congregation), Hyde Park MA (Adas Hadrath Israel) and Scarsdale NY (Mevakshei Derech). He was predeceased by his beloved wife Shirley (Zebberman) and her son Garry, and survived by children Mirele (Richard Marker), Leizer (Sharon Bray), Rachel (Howard Ungar), and step-children Beila Sherman, Dawn Rosen (Sam zā€l), Miryawm Faerman (Hillel), Tova Sherman (Joe Lang), grandchildren, and great-grandchildren.

    For Manny

    How does one usually choose a friend, a teacher, a mentor? 

    I first met Manny at a Reconstructionist convention in Montreal in 1967. Manny led the Friday night service by starting with the Aaron Zeitlin poem ā€œPraise me, says God, and I will know that you love meā€. He recited it in Yiddish. I was moved. This changed my understanding of a synagogue service. Yiddish could and should be used to enhance the experience. I introduced myself to Manny, and expressed my gratitude for his use of mama loshen in the service. His response was that Yiddish is part of the Jewish civilization and should be incorporated into all synagogue services. I was left thinking. That Sunday, at a plenary session, the question of starting a Reconstructionist college where Kaplanian thought and teaching could be promulgated was discussed. It was Manny who championed the idea against the wishes of those who felt that starting a college would take too much energy away from The Reconstructionist magazine. Mannyā€™s erudite persistence prevailed, and we all know the result.

    I renewed my acquaintance with Manny when he came to Montreal as the principal of the brand new Bialik High School, a high school where Yiddish was being taught and where my children would eventually graduate. Weā€™d meet frequently back then, mostly in Yiddish bookstores. Heā€™d pull out books from the shelves and INSIST they needed to be part of my library. Each book would be explained and championed for their implications in our lives. Our friendship grew as did our arguments. But, so did my learning from his teachings. His knowledge was vast in both civil society and Yiddish-Jewish civilization. Manny became my mentor.

    On Saturday nights his Yiddish music abilities shone. We would sit at our piano and sing Yiddish songs together. He and I were the only ones who knew and sang Lewandowskiā€™s ā€Ha Mavdilā€ and boy, would we sing it with gusto! 

    Manny had a great sense of humor. He realized that to lead a service and keep his congregations interested, he needed to tell a joke. Shirley secretly told me Manny would keep a Jewish joke book hidden behind his siddur when he was sitting on the pulpit ā€“but not leading the service. 

    At Mirelle and Richardā€™s wedding, Manny put on a clown suit, danced, sang and MCā€™ed the evening as the shtetl Badkhn would have done in days gone by.

    Mannyā€™s Judaism was a commitment to justice for all. He insisted I see or read Matthew Lopezā€™s play ā€œThe Whipping Man.ā€  The thoughts and ideas expressed in the play about freedom, slavery and democracy were important, he told me, for every Jew, not only for their personal lives, but particularly in their relationships to other oppressed populations. He taught me that!

    In Florida, he brought me to a concert by Emil Gorovets, a Yiddish singer who at the time had just left Soviet Ukraine. He sang the songs of the murdered poets, which of course, lead Manny to an hours-long conversation with Gorovets about the fate of Jewish poets, artists and doctors under Stalin. True to Mannyā€™s personality, after that discussion, we made our way to Jewish bookstore where he insisted I buy every book about Stalinā€™s Russian that had ever been printed. 

    His sense of justice and humor also extended to the intolerance of our own kind. When Shirleyā€™s daughter Miriam and Hillel were married in an ultraorthodox wedding, Manny was called up for a Sheva brocha as Mr. Goldsmith. The officiantā€™s unwillingness to recognize Mannyā€™s semicha didnā€™t deter him. Once on the bima, he looked at his counterpart and replied, ā€œitā€™s Rabbi Doctor Emmanuel Goldsmith.ā€

    It didnā€™t long for Manny to be recognized by the cognoscenti world. 

    Manny organized Kaplan conferences at Queens College and as well, was invited to attend conferences convened by others to speak on Kaplanian ideas.

    Because of Mannyā€™s research on and writings about Henry Nelson Weiman, he was invited to attend the Highland Institute conferences where he presented and was engaged. Both Manny and Shirley related the stimulation and the joy they experienced there. 

    Manny taught Yiddish at Oxford University summer school in England.

    These encounters often lead to important scholarship and influence upon others:

    After attending a conference convened by Rafiel Patie, Manny and Patie published a two-volume anthology on ā€œModern Jewish Thought and Thinkers.ā€

    When Manny attended the International Conference of Yiddish Theater groups in Montreal, he gave a genius erudite analysis of a Jewish movie. When he was finished, a fellow lecture attendee offered, ā€œThatā€™s why I took his lectures at Queens College, and thatā€™s why I became a professor of Jewish studies.ā€

    When Manny worked on his two volumes of ā€œYiddish Literature in America-1870-2000,ā€  he called me to ask if I could get him pictures of the Montreal writers Korn, Elberg, Ravitch, and Rosenfarb. How could I refuse? As I knew them all, I took the time to locate them and get what Manny wanted, as well as some unpublished work of Elberg, which I also sent to Manny. Aside from referring to various poems and writing, I glean and cherish most from reading and rereading Mannyā€™s brilliant fourteen-page introduction to both the authors and their writings. It is through Mannyā€™s interpretations that we can appreciate the creative powers unleashed by Jewish civilizationā€™s newfound freedom in America to express itself.

    Manny produced for Truro College two series of audio tapes on 1. People of Importance in Eastern European History and 2. Shapers of Modern Jewish Thought.  There are 13 lectures in each set, and to this day these tapes are still the most convenient way for anyone wishing to learn their heritage.

    One of Mannyā€™s best traits was his fearlessness in speaking Truth to Power!

    Manny spent weeks in the summer at Circle Camp and lectured in and about Yiddish. He complained that while he enjoyed the Yiddish, he missed the commitment to Jewish ritual. 

    After attending a conference of the Society for Humanistic Judaism, he said they have many good Kaplanian ideas, but they had to bring the Torah down from the shelf where they have put it ā€“and read and fight with what it said!

    When Manny was invited to be at Klezkanada to lead and present on Yiddishisms, he taught Sholom Asch and his exposing of the darker side of Jewish community such as prostitution, conversion, Jesus, and at the time, the taboo of Lesbianism. There were many in the audience who were enraged at the subject as they were aware the ā€œYiddish Forwardā€ had ostracized Aschā€™s writings. A professor from McGill Universityā€™s Jewish studies program was especially enraged. Manny, like a Ninja, took them all on! He was unafraid to tell them we were not Godā€™s Chosen People, and that we had our dark sides like everyone else. 

    Manny told me a story, which I am sure he told many others. As a student counsellor of children at Camp Cejwin he was walking and arguing with Kaplan. Manny disagreed at a point and responded to Kaplan ā€œBut Rabbi, you yourself saidā€¦ā€ to which Kaplan angrily replied, ā€œI never could have said that,ā€ and walked away in a huff. Manny was sure that Kaplan would never talk to him again. The next morning, Kaplan came up to Manny in the dining hall and said, ā€œManny, you were right. I looked myself up.ā€ Truth to Power!

    At a class at the Jewish Theological seminary, he asked Abraham Joshua Heschel, ā€œDoes he believe in Revelation?ā€ HesChel prevaricated. Manny repeated, ā€œYes or no, do you believe?ā€ Heshel walked out of the room. Manny followed him to his office and repeated over and over, ā€œdo you believe in revelation from heaven, yes or no?ā€ When Heschel finally said ā€œyes,ā€ Manny said thank you and walked out of the room. Again, truth to power. He was fearless and determined. 

    I have not here spoken about Mannyā€™s commitment to Kaplan ā€“ that is well known, and others will speak to it.

    And so, let me end where I began. 

    How does one choose a friend, teacher, and mentor?
    By setting and being an example of their teachings. 
    And those teachings and examples began for me in 1967, with Zeitlinā€™s Yiddish poem. 

    Zeitlinā€™s poem is a call to action that we must always be involved: ā€œIf you neither curse nor praise, then I have created you in vain, says Godā€. Manny praised loudly and cursed softly. He created an oeuvre that will be studied, read, and listened to for many years to come. He has left our Jewish civilization much greater for having lived. I will carry his memory in me for the rest of my life. 

    I very deeply regret to report that Professor Emanuel Goldsmith has passed away. For many years he taught Jewish Studies at Queens College with a strong expertise in the Yiddish language and literature. At the same time he was a deeply committed Reconstructionist having not only read and written about Mordecai Kaplan but actually worked with Kaplan at the SAJ in the early sixties.

    Manny, as we all called him, was probably responsible for a number of important things including the title of ā€œ Not So Random Thoughts.ā€ He proudly related to me many times that Kaplan and he were talking about the book which contains the many one liners referred to as Random Thoughts and originally published in the Reconstructionist. ā€œ Why not call the book ā€œ Not so Random Thoughts. ā€œ he said to Kaplan, and thatā€™s how the title came to be.

    Manny was a rabbis rabbi. Deeply informed about many areas of the Jewish experience and a committed Recontructionist, Goldsmith was a profoundly devoted person. His commitments and his vitality . were infectious to the many congregants in the several congregations which he served as rabbi. His energy and liveliness were noteworthy in his fine singing voice which we all enjoyed.

    I first met Manny when we were teen agers and students at the Jewish Theological Seminary. We were both students in the night program at the Seminary College and Manny went on to become a Conservative rabbi.. Over the years we lost touch but I saw him again at Mordecai Kaplanā€™s funeral in 1983. We talked then and afterwards and he invited me to collaborate with him on a Kaplan reader he was working on, entitled ā€œ Dynamic Judaism. ā€œ The reader was originally published by Schocken Books and the Reconstructionist Press. Over the years this work was translated into Hebrew and published by Yediot Ahronot in Israel.

    Mannyā€™s scholarship was vast and he was particularly proud of the contacts and articles he published making Kaplan known not only to the Jewish community but also to many Christian colleagues . He also may have been a key figure in the establishment of the Reconstructionist College. In the late sixties when the idea of the college was very much on peopleā€™s minds, Manny was a very strong supporter when some others had doubts as to whether the rather small community of Reconstructionists could support an independent institution.

    But of course in the last analysis accomplishments are less important that what we become as a person. The word that keeps on coming back to me , a word which Kaplan favored , is ā€œvitality.ā€ Manny was one of the most vital people I have known. He was very much alive in so many ways and everyone who knew him felt it. As Jews and as human beings we would do well to follow his example.

  • Chutzpod Podcast

    Primary Contact – Rabbi Shira Stutman
    sstutman@gmail.com
    https://chutzpod.com/home

    We invite you to listen to our podcast.
    Chutzpod!

    Chutzpod! is a spiritual, educational, and joyous podcast designed for non-religious Jews and spiritual seekers of all types, and one of the most successful Jewish podcasts in the world. Each episode of this weekly podcast explores a different spiritual question, holiday celebration, or mindfulness practice, often using the weekly Torah portion as a springboard.

    Episodes are hosted by West Wing and Scandal actor Joshua Malina (long-time member of a Reconstructionist congregation) and noted Rabbi Shira Stutman, RRC class of 2007.

    Mordecai Kaplan understood that in order for Judaism not only to survive but also to thrive, it needed a refurbishment, revival, and sometimes entirely new iteration of Jewish culture, language, religious practice, and understanding of God, one based both on all the Jewish generations that came before, and understanding that changes will continue in ways unimaginable in the generations to come. And that these changes, developments, and leaps of faith will come especially quickly in the goldene medina of America, where Jews live with an unparalleled freedom and in which scientific, psychological, historical, and other forms of knowledge expand at an exponential pace.

    Kaplan also understood that Judaism is not something that takes place only around a dinner table or on a bima, that it is more than religious rites and rituals, that it includes peoplehood and culture as well. Kaplan was also a teacher and a public intellectual. He wanted to get his ideas out into the wider world.

    If he lived in 2022, would Mordecai Kaplan be a podcaster? Perhaps he would have considered it too low-brow a medium. But we like to think that he would have felt aligned with the goals of Chutzpod!, one of the leading Jewish podcasts in the world.

    Chutzpod, too, understands the universe of multiple identities, specifically that of Jewish Americans who fully desire to embody both civilizations.

    We have found that there are three basic Chutzpod archetypes, each represented below by a recent email from an actual listener:

    The spiritual seeker: ā€œI have been listening to Chutzpod! since the first episode, and I wanted to write to express my thanks to you. I am not Jewish, but I have been undergoing something of a crisis of faith recently, and your words and conversation often speak life to me. I’m so grateful for you two, who are keeping me tethered to spirituality and the divine when the roots and ties I have had in the past have all but evaporated.ā€

    The Jew who wants to know more: ā€œAs someone who grew up in a family that described itself as ā€˜Jew-ishā€™ I’ve often felt not ā€˜Jewish enoughā€™ to engage, and this podcast is one of the first times the door feels truly open to me. I keep having moments of ā€˜oh, so that’s why Grandpa used to say that!ā€™ I’m learning, I’m reflecting, and I’m connecting with my heritage — thank you for this gift.ā€

    The wandering Jew: ā€œI have missed going to synagogue since the pandemic started, but at the same time inertia has kept me from returning. Chutzpod has become part of my Shabbat routine – I listen to it while cleaning up after the Friday night meal.ā€

  • What We Are Reading

    ā€œThe Parting of the Ways? Open Orthodox Judaism in Historical Perspectiveā€

    ā€œAtheism as my path to High Holy Days enlightenmentā€

    ā€œLearning Judaism as a Native Language Requires More Than Synagogue Once a Yearā€

    ā€œStephen Hawkingā€™s Shofarā€

    ā€œOn Judeo-Persian Language and Literature | Part One: State of the Fieldā€

    ā€œThe Reform movementā€™s new holiday prayer book is radically inclusiveā€

    ā€œThe Parting of the Ways? Open Orthodox Judaism in Historical Perspectiveā€

    The Pathology Plaguing American Jews

    The Lilliputians in Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels may have been speaking Hebrew

    In Polls We Trust

    New Show from Slam Poet Vanessa Hidary Takes on Jewish Identity

    The Unusual Pe Preceding Ayin Order in the Acrostics of the Book of Eikhah

    For first time in 100 years, outsider tapped to lead Looksteinsā€™ N.Y. shul

    Alan Brill Interview with Adam Ferziger ā€“ Beyond Sectarianism

    Seraphs

    Ancient Mosaic Discovered in Israel May Depict Alexander the Great Meeting a Jewish Priest

    Did Israel’s President Really Refer to Reform Judaism as ‘Idol Worship’?

    Israeli Rock Musicā€™s Spiritual New Sound

    Is Capitalism Hurting Synagogue Life?

    Why the King James Version of the Bible Remains the Best

  • Shabbat School Family Cooperative and Curriculum Treasury

    Primary Contact: Deborah Eisenbach-Budner 
    deborah@havurahshalom.org
    www.havurahshalom.org

    All of us who work as Jewish community and identity builders know what recent studies confirm: Jewish educational experiences, speaking broadly, are more vital and have a long-lasting impact when they are integrated into the rest of a child or adultā€™s life. Kaplan knew this long ago when he wrote ā€œIf Jewish education is to prove its worthā€¦the scope of the Jewish teacher must be enlarged to include the home of the child s/he teaches…ā€ In the Havurah Shalom Shabbat School Family Cooperative, the parent truly embodies  the ā€œJewish teacher,ā€ bridging the learning, community, and the home, helping integrate Judaism and life in a holistic way.  

    Inspired by their vibrant, positive camp experiences, founders of Havurah Shalom designed the K-6 Shabbat School as a Family Cooperative, bringing families together for learning and teaching. Now, with the direction and support of our education staff, Shabbat School parents work together in 28 teams; each team collectively plans and implements 4 class sessions for their childā€™s grade. The 90-family program serves 127 students in Grades K-6, with 100 parent-teachers (some teach 2 grades), and has a rich online Curriculum Treasury,Ā  robust support for parent-teachers, and systems that promote and support strong community bonds. (Please see the 20 minute film ā€œCelebrating 40 Years of Shabbat School!ā€ for visuals, interviews, and to see the model in action.)

    Our project is to make our model, including  both the curricular and administrative resources we have developed, accessible to other communities to adopt or adapt. Some may want to adapt the parent-teacher cooperative model. Others will find the Curriculum Treasury to be a helpful tool for hired teachers to use. A school could adopt the entire curricular, as well. Enlarged and refined each year, the Curriculum Treasury currently contains 28 curriculum frameworks for 7 grades, 1003 activities, 261 sample lesson plans created by parent-teachers, and 653 additional curriculum resources.  

    We are inspired by the impact of our model on parents, children, families, and our community. It has been tested in real-time on hundreds of students and parents (similar to other families in Jewish communities throughout the U.S.) evolving over many years to meet changing needs. We would like to share the model and Curriculum Treasury in a comprehensive and helpful way, including learning about the potential settings and needs of interested communities. 

  • Israel Talmud Page

    In 1953, Mordecai Kaplan wrote an important volume, A New Zionism.  We asked four contributors to reflect on the following questions:  

    • What is the new element of a new, New Zionism that needs to be added fifty years later, in 2023?
    • How can the ā€œnew elementā€ reflect sensitivity to the present crisis regarding democracy in Israel?  

    Their responses remind us of the complex weaving of the religious, national, and ethical threads of Kaplanian thought.

    The focus on Israelā€™s rich but delicate place in Kaplanian thought, especially as we move deeper into the 21st century, is also reflected in our April 23rd webinar and an article about a conference staged by the Kaplan Center in Jerusalem this past July.

    Additional Commentaries

    from Rabbi Bob Gluck

    Givat Haviva, Israel and a vision of a shared society, in light of Mordecai Kaplanā€™s teachings:
    Maybe it is precisely during times when peace between Jews and Palestinians seems most distant and unattainable that it is most essential for us to maintain a long view. As difficult as this may seem to place the politics aside, Israelā€™s sustainable, secure, and just existence may well depend upon some vision of a shared society. Concurrent with the unabating struggles regarding the West Bank and Gaza, there are cities and villages within Israel that have mixed or adjoining Jewish and Palestinian/Arab populations. Read more….

    Please submit your commentary here. We’ll post selected submissions on this page.

    Name(Required)

  • Kaplan Center Webinars

    Upcoming Webinars

    We are pleased to share with you the full list of webinars that we are hosting in the coming months. Download a pdf of the list here, or view past webinars here.

    Sunday, December 8, 2024 ā€“ 1pm Eastern Standard Time (EST)
    Tribute Honoring Mel Scultā€™s 90th birthday

    Sunday, February 9, 2025 – 1pm Eastern Standard Time (EST)
    Tu bā€™Shevat ā€“ Judaism and the Environment with Rabbis Michael Cohen and Fred Dobb

    Sunday, March 23, 2025 ā€“ 3pm Eastern Daylight Time (EDT)
    Between Father and Daughter: Exploring the Career and Influence of Judith Kaplan Eisenstein with Rabbi Liz Bolton

    Sunday, May 18, 2025 ā€“ 3pm Eastern Daylight Time (EDT)
    Pirke Mordecai – Several of RRCā€™s Yovel recipients reflect on the meaning of Mordecai Kaplan’s heritage to them

    And more:


    Past Webinars:

    For information about the webinars, contact Jeffrey Schein (Jeffrey@KaplanCenter.org) or Eric Caplan (Eric@KaplanCenter.org)

  • Kaplan, Zionism, and Us

     by Rabbi Toba Spitzer

    In The Meaning of God in Modern Jewish Religion (published in 1937), in the chapter on Chanukah, Mordecai Kaplan reflected on Jewish survival in the face of competing cultures. He wrote: “Paradoxical as it may seem, if a nation wishes to survive, it must not make survival itself its supreme objective, but rather aim at the achievement of the highest intellectual, esthetic and social good that alone makes national survival important to its individual members.ā€ (p. 352). He then goes on to talk about the Zionist project in what was then Palestine:

    “The motive that has been the dynamic force behind Jewish achievement in Palestine has been a faith in the destiny of [humanity] to achieve a better social order that has not yet been achieved anywhere, one in which nationalism would function not as an aggressive military or economic force in the hands of predatory interests, but as a civilizing agency utilizing the cultural traditions of the various peoples for intellectual growth, esthetic enjoyment, and social communion. Combined with this motive has been the faith that the Jewish people, if given a chance to develop in contact with nature and under autonomous political conditions in its own land, could and should make a significant contribution to this goal… Were this faith to become inoperative, Palestine would soon become but another Jewish ghetto, with no more appeal to the loyalty of the Jew, with no more power to stir our imagination or to elicit from us that self-forgetful devotion with which the Palestinian enterprise has so far happily evoked, than any other center of Jewish populationā€ (p. 354).

    Lately I have been musing on Kaplanā€™s prophetic words, and wondering what he would make of the challenge that present-day Israel poses to ā€œthe loyalty of the Jewā€ in the diaspora. Kaplan is held up as the archetypal Zionist, both within the Reconstructionist movement and beyond. And it is certainly true that he was devoted to the creation of a Jewish homeland in the historic land of Israel, and had deep personal connections to the state of Israel after its founding. Yet as Noam Pianko powerfully illustrates in his 2010 book, Zionism and the Roads Not Taken, Kaplanā€™s brand of Zionismā€”a non-statist, idealistic vision of ā€œethical nationhoodā€ā€”was never incorporated into the mainstream of  Zionist thought or practice. Kaplan and his circle  differentiated between a Zionism that would function as an international movement binding together Jews wherever they lived, and the creation of a sovereign Jewish political entity in historic Palestine. Writing in The Reconstructionist in February 1949, the editors argued that the flag of the new state of Israel should not be the blue and white Zionist flag, but rather a flag that represented ā€œthe aspirations of all the citizens of Israel,ā€ and would acknowledge the ā€œArab minorityā€ in the state (and that there should be a separate flag to represent global Jewry). In 1955, in A New Zionism, Kaplan wrote: ā€œThe State of Israel cannot be a Jewish State, nor can world Jewry continue to be a nation in the modern sense. The State of Israel will have to be an Israeli State, and world Jewry will have to be metamorphosed into a Jewish People which is rooted in Eretz Yisrael and which has its branches wherever it is allowed to liveā€ (p.page 93).

    As Pianko illustrates in his study, Kaplan was wary of the ā€œbellicoseā€ nature of state-based nationalisms as they manifested after World War II, and he criticized ā€œthe sort of irresponsible and obsolete national sovereignty that modern nations claim for themselves,ā€ going on to argue that this concept of sovereignty ā€œis liable to bring about a catastrophe that will destroy the very foundations of human civilizationā€ (Future of the American Jew, p. 125).  Pianko explains that ā€œKaplan proposed peoplehood to stand in for nationhood after his initial term became too closely associated with statehood.ā€ (Roads Not Taken, p. 198).

    All of which is to say, we should be honest in admitting that none of us have any real idea of what Kaplan would be saying about the current state of affairs in Israel or where he would come down on present-day debates about Zionism. His thinking about issues of Jewish peoplehood and nationalism in general were complex, and one could make a plethora of arguments grounded in Kaplanā€™s words and deeds. Rather than making speculative claims about ā€œwhat would Kaplan say?ā€, those of us who consider ourselves Kaplanā€™s intellectual heirs (and I consider myself among that group) would better be guided by Kaplanā€™s ability to interrogate the conformist thought around him, to pose radical questions, and to stay current with the debates roiling hisā€”and ourā€”communities today. Having said that, I will allow myself,  for the sake of argument, to wonder what indeed Kaplan might be  thinking in this moment.

    In my imagination, Kaplan would be wrestling with the growing trend of non- and anti-Zionism among many American Jews, especially those of a younger generation, and inquiring into its origins. In the wake of the passage of the Nation-State Law, which formally enshrined Jewish supremacy in Israel as a Basic Law, I can also imagine him questioning whether it is still possible to consider Israel  both a Jewish and a democratic state, or one still capable of reflecting the universal values which he held up as the raison dā€™ĆŖtre of ā€œethical nationhood.ā€

    I also imagine Kaplan challenging the reactivity of aspects of anti-Zionist thought, which in many ways is defined by mainstream Zionist assumptions and simply replaces them with their opposite. He would not question the Jewish right to self-determination or the assertion of Jewish peoplehood/nationhood, nor would he tolerate reducing the Zionist project to a maleficentĀ extension of European settler-colonialism. But I do believe he would wrestle seriously with the facts of the ongoing Nakba, the erasure of Palestinian ties to the land and the destruction of Palestinian society and culture which began in 1948 and which continue today, both within the bounds of Israel proper and in Gaza and the West Bank.Ā 

    When I articulated the ā€œnew mitzvahā€ of ahavat yoshvei haā€™aretz, an obligation to care about and remain engaged with all who dwell in the land of Israel/Palestine, I was doing so from what I consider a Kaplanian perspective. What are the demands of this historical moment in which we Jews find ourselves? What do our values ask of us? How do we follow Kaplanā€™s early admonition that ā€œif a nation wishes to survive, it must not make survival itself its supreme objectiveā€? In my mind, the radical, visionary Kaplan of the 1930s and ā€˜40s would not be litigating the past, nor wasting time on the binary of Zionism/anti-Zionism. He would be seeking to provide new answers for all Jews everywhere, and especially in his beloved Israel and his beloved America. He would understand that the simple fact of Jewish and Palestinian existence upon and devotion to the land necessitates new models of confederation and partnership. He would be committed, I have little doubt, to the understanding that in this moment, Jewish and Palestinian liberation are bound up together, and must be striven for together. And we, following in his footsteps, can help cultivate new thinking about how Jewish culture and values can be nurtured in a state where Jews continue to build a home, but which would not be a ā€œJewish state.ā€ A place where Jews, Palestinians, and all others can live with full dignity, equality, freedom, and security.  

    May we who are inspired by Kaplan wrestle together to create new visions and new possibilities, with open hearts and minds, for the sake of all who dwell in Israel/historic Palestine, for Jewish communities around the globe, for all who dwell on Earth.